Low-profile’ EU Nominees Spark Uproar

BRUSSELS – The appointment of two low-profile figures to the European Union’s top jobs is triggering a storm of criticism on Friday, November 20, for dropping plans to name diplomatic heavyweights. "EU leaders have continued the job of weakening the EU institutions," said Daniel Cohn-Bendit, a leader of the Greens party in the European parliament, reported Agence France-Presse (AFP).

"They have followed their weak choice of commission president with a bland council president and an unremarkable foreign affairs high representative.

“Europe is sinking to a low. The good news is that things can only get better."

EU leaders on Thursday appointed Belgian Prime Minister Herman Van Rompuy as Europe's first president and British Baroness Catherine Ashton, the EU Trade Commissioner, as the bloc’s foreign minister.

"I accept your decision and I thank you for the honour you have given me," said Van Rompuy, who takes up the post on January 1.

He said he would be a president "with conviction”, promising to move "step by step" to help Europe out of "exceptionally difficult times, a period of anxiety, uncertainty and lack of confidence".

Van Rompuy and Ashton are compromise candidates who plan to use quiet diplomacy and consensus.

"I believe my experience will speak for itself,” said Ashton.

“Judge me on what I do and I think you'll pleased with the outcome," added Ashton, who earned a reputation as an effective negotiator

The two posts were created under the EU's Lisbon treaty which reforms decision-making in a bid to give the 27-nation bloc more credibility in dealing with the likes of the United States and China.

Agreement on the positions took weeks, undermining efforts to present the bloc as a united force.

The breakthrough came when Prime Minister Gordon Brown dropped his backing for former prime minister Tony Blair for the EU’s president post.

Dismay

The European press also blasted the choices, warning that the new picks don’t carry the weight needed to compete on world stage with the US and China.

"Herman Who?" said Sweden's Dagens Nyheter newspaper in an editorial.

"This means that the EU will again have an unknown figure whom few Europeans can identify.”

Spain's El Pais newspaper said the EU will be "led by two dull and low-profile figures."

Germany's Frankfurter Rundschau said the EU will be represented by "leaders with no sparkle, without a vision and even without experience in the required fields."

The British press were also critical of the European selections.

"The choice of two relative unknowns ... dismayed those who wanted to give Europe more clout on the world stage," The Financial Times said.

"More likely the US president and Chinese premier will continue to work with Europe primarily through bilateral talks with Berlin, London, and Paris."

The Guardian agree, saying the appointments dashed "any hope of Europe forcing the pl to pay it fresh attention."

"The continent last night took a step away from the top table, missing a valuable chance to halt the slide towards a G2 world, dominated by the twin poles of Washington and Beijing.

"Nheless, the EU will continue to matter, even as (China's) President Hu (Jintao) sits down with President Who?"

Source: IslamOnline

Bookmark and Share | Home | Daily News | We Are On... |

US Military Presence Irritates Afghans

CAIRO – Like most Afghans, Akhtar Mohammed Shinwari can’t wait for the moment to see American troops leaving his Muslim country. “People hate the Americans from the bottom of their hearts,” Haji Akhtar told The Times on Friday, November 20.

Shinwari was shocked by Afghan President Hamid Karzai’s statements in his inauguration speech that the American troops would hand over security over the next five years.

Karzai’s remarks immediately brought to the Afghan man’s memories the scenes of 19 people killed and 50 wounded in US attacks outside his Shinwar village in 2007.

“People don’t like their operations,” he said.

“They search houses without permission, detain people without trial.”

Shinwari is not alone.

“We still don’t know why they did it,” said Niaz Amin, who lost his older brother and a grandfather in American operations last year.

“When they came into the house I tried to speak to them in English but they shouted, ‘Don’t speak’,” the 20-year-old student from neighboring Rakhzi village recalled.

“The first time they came my brother ran out and he was wounded by an airstrike. They took him to the hospital but brought back his body.

“Eight days later my grandfather was shot when he went out of the mosque.”

The US invaded the central Asian Muslim country in 2001 following the 9/11 attacks to topple the ruling Taliban and ally Al-Qaeda.

Analysts have repeatedly warned that the indiscriminate killing of civilians is turning ordinary Afghans against US-led foreign troops and eroding fragile public support for the West-backed Karzai government.

Insecurity

Because of the US military presence, many Afghans see security as a far-fetched dream.

“They should just stay in their bases,” Shinwari said.

“More troops won’t bring peace. We need economic development, not soldiers.”

Fazil Hakim agrees, ridiculing US claims that the troops are seeking to maintain security.

“Wherever the troops are there’s instability,” said the 36-year-old.

“They bring problems with them.”

As the US troops move along the Afghani villages, feelings of insecurity are getting severer.

“When the Americans drive along the roads they don’t let anyone overtake them,” Shinwari said.

“It doesn’t matter if you’re transporting a dead body or a sick woman to hospital.

“Even if they get a puncture or break down, if it takes one hour or two days, they don’t let anybody overtake them.”

Echoing similar concerns, analysts agree that the foreign military presence is hindering the Afghan government itself.

“There are many disadvantages to having foreign troops on the front line,” said Gerard Russell, a former British political attaché in Kabul.

“It’s holding the Afghans back and saving them from the need to solve their problems themselves.

“Until the Government realizes this is a fight for its own survival it won’t make the tough decisions, and they won’t realize that as long as we the international community are in the way.”

Source: IslamOnline

Bookmark and Share | Home | Daily News | We Are On... |