Turkey votes for new constitution to redefine country’s future


Turks have approved constitutional changes that are set to reshape the judiciary and curb the powers of the military, in a referendum seen as a tussle between an Islamist-influenced government and its secular opponents.

A provisional count, after polls closed at 14:00 GMT on Sunday, showed 58 per cent of voters approving the amendments, with 99 per cent of ballot boxes counted, according to NTV, a Turkish broadcaster.

“According to provisional results, the changes were approved by about 58 per cent … The turnout was between 77 and 78 per cent,” Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the Turkish prime minister, said.

Earlier opinion polls had suggested up to 56 per cent of Turks could approve the 26 constitutional amendments or that it might be too close to call.

“We have passed a historic threshold on the way to advanced democracy and the supremacy of law,” Erdogan told cheering supporters of a vote that was seen as a crucial test for his governing Justice and Development Party (AKP).

‘Good for the government’

Al Jazeera’s Anita McNaught reporting from Ankara, the capital, said the results are “probably better than what the government had hoped for … a slim win for the government would have been destabilising”.

Semih Idiz, a columnist for Milliyet newspaper, agreed that preliminary results were “a good margin for the government”.

“It’s better than expected, and it’s a good endorsement ahead of next year’s elections … I think the prime minister must be feeling pretty comfortable,” Idiz told the Reuters news agency.

Defeat could have damaged the AKP’s morale before a parliamentary election due by July 2011.

Erdogan has said changes are needed to strengthen democracy and bring Turkey closer to European norms, as the country continues its bid to join the European Union.

Critics of the overhaul from the “no” camp, said some of the changes would allow Erdogan’s party to take over the courts, undermining the secular nature of the Turkish state.

Some 50 million people were eligible to vote in the referendum that fell on the 30th anniversary of the 1980 military coup, which produced the current constitution, which critics say gives too much power to the military and court officials.

Kurdish activists in Turkey’s southeast, who have waged an armed campaign against the government, had called for a boycott of the vote.

EU position

The EU’s executive European Commission has backed Ankara’s attempt to reorganise the judiciary, but accused the government on Tuesday of stifling public debate over the proposals.

The AKP evolved from a series of Islamist parties banned by the courts, but denies having any aims to roll back the republic’s traditional secularism.

Polarisation over the referendum reflects Turkey’s fractured political landscape, in which a rising middle class of observant Muslims who form the backbone of the AKP have challenged a secular elite which has traditionally held power since Mustafa Kemal Ataturk founded modern Turkey in 1923.

“The battle is really not between Islamists and secularists; the battle is between reformists and those who defend the status quo,” Ibrahim Kalin, a senior adviser to Erdogan, told Al Jazeera.

Our correspondent in Ankara said that opposition parties did not mount an effective campaign against the changes.

“The leader of the Republican People’s Party (CHP) [the main opposition] could not vote because his paper work was not in order, which was symbolic of the problems in the ‘no’ campaign,” McNaught said.

To celebrate his party’s victory, the Turkish prime minister will watch his country play the United States in the 2010 Basketball World Championship final in Istanbul, our correspondent said.

Daily UpdateBookmark and Share

Pakistan floods not over yet: millions still face hunger & disease


Donor fatigue kicks in after a week or two of any natural disaster. It is a very natural process as things move very quickly on the world stage. People forget about a godforsaken place as a disaster unfolds in some other corner of the world. The best antidote to this lassitude is a relentless media campaign. And that’s what is missing in the Pakistan floods.

While the coverage had been pervasive during the first two weeks, it has taken a backstage in recent days. Google News search for ‘Lady Gaga’ returned 20,200 results whereas ‘Pakistan Floods’ had a return of 12,300. True that news is still published but mostly in the back pages thus diminishing their chance of being read by people — and reducing any chances of further donations. One cannot blame the news writers and layout editors as other — and more important — news has taken center stage. Nevertheless, a little more highlighting will be good for the millions of victims.

More coverage is needed because the floods have not subsided yet. Manchar Lake, the largest fresh water lake in South Asia, is expected to burst its banks, thus causing more damage in the already ravaged Sindh province. This will uproot hundreds of thousands of people and thus create more problems for the flood managers of Pakistan.

There is also a perception that the devastation has not been extensive in Pakistan. People are not to blame for this. One unconsciously evaluates a disaster by looking at the death toll, which has remained rather low for Pakistan with around 1,800 deaths. Many are also not aware of the river floods that are devastating but slow moving. They are not like the tsunami that destroys everything in its path but recedes within a few hours. They affect far greater areas and work like slow poison, killing everything in their path but without making much of a noise. Lives were saved as evacuations were ordered but people lost their livestock and crops — their only livelihood in the dirt poor rural areas of Pakistan.

Compassion is thus still needed because the first phase of flooding is not over. As for the rehabilitation, Pakistan is stretching its muscles and the IMF has already extended a helping hand. The Pakistani government is intent on accepting this loan despite the fact that they can generate their own resources for the rehabilitation process. The country has a poor taxation system and the lack of land reforms has crippled the governance. Global donors should also scale back their grants or loans for the rehab process as that’s not a right thing to do.

It is, however, still the first stage. And it requires global attention to save lives.

Daily UpdateBookmark and Share